State Issue 4: Argument and Explanation Against
Don't Be Fooled by Tobacco Companies
Vote NO on the Pro-Smoking Constitutional Amendment
Vote No on Issue 4 to keep secondhand smoke out of restaurants and other public places.
RJ Reynolds and other tobacco companies are proposing and funding a pro-smoking constitutional amendment. Smoke Less Ohio would keep smoke in restaurants and other public places and put customers and workers at risk from secondhand smoke, a proven health hazard.
The American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, doctors, hospitals, and every Ohio public health organization oppose Smoke Less Ohio because it would:
- Deny your right to breathe smoke-free air in public places.
- Keep smoke in restaurants and bowling alleys, exposing children, the elderly and those with health problems to secondhand smoke.
- Overturn smoke-free laws in 21 cities across Ohio including Columbus and make it unconstitutional for lawmakers to enact future clean indoor air ordinances.
The U.S. Surgeon General confirmed that secondhand smoke causes cancer, heart disease and lung disease. He also confirmed that separate smoking sections like those proposed by Smoke Less Ohio do not protect health.
Smoke Less Ohio would make it unconstitutional to protect more than half a million hospitality workers and their customers from exposure to secondhand smoke. No worker should have to choose between earning a living and protecting his or her health.
Smoke Less Ohio alters the Constitution to protect the tobacco industry's bottom line. Lawmakers and voters could only change the Smoke Less Ohio proposal through another constitutional amendment—a costly and lengthy process.
Smoke Less Ohio would create different rules for similar businesses and make a level playing field for all Ohio businesses impossible.
Smoke Less Ohio FAILS to protect the workers and citizens of Ohio from secondhand smoke. Vote NO on Issue 4.
James M. Sudimack, M.D., President, Ohio State Medical Association